Teoretisk fysiks kursutväderingar


Resultat av: Statistical Mechanics, 5A1390, vt 2006

Status: Avslutad
Publicerad under: 2007-05-04 - 2007-05-30
Antal svar: 8
Procent av kursdeltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Patrik Henelius

Genral opinion about the course

8 svarande

Very good5 62%
Good2 25%
Average1 12%
Bad0 0%
Very bad0 0%

- Maybe change the name of the course since what we do is not statistical mechanics but more statistical physics (Very good)
- Riktigt bra tavelteknik. (Very good)
- Intressant och l?tt att f?rst? (kan bero p? f?rel?sare!) (Very good)
- the review of the course given is the second last lecture is exactly the thing I would want on the first lecture in a course (Average)

Opinion about the lectures

8 svarande

Very good6 75%
Good2 25%
Average0 0%
Bad0 0%
Very bad0 0%

- ?ven n?r jag inte kunde grundkursen till statistical mechanics kunde jag h?nga med! (Very good)
- Inget att klaga p (Very good)
- Very good lecturer! (Very good)

Opinion about the exercises

8 svarande

Very good2 25%
Good4 50%
Average2 25%
Bad0 0%
Very bad0 0%
I did not participate0 0%

- "Att f?rs?ka sj?lv" systemet borde inf?ras p? andra kurser! (Very good)
- jag tycker att det ?r b?ttre att han l?ser uppgifterna fullst?ndigt p? tavlan. (Average)

Quality of the textbook

8 svarande

Very good1 12%
Good4 50%
Average2 25%
Bad0 0%
Very bad1 12%
I did not have access to it0 0%

- Almost completely useless. The only thing I got from it was which words and phrases to google/look up in other books. (Very bad)

How did you find the homework

8 svarande

Valuable4 50%
Average3 37%
Not so valuable1 12%
I did not do it0 0%

- Men jag har ?nnu inte lyckats l?sa talen. Men sv?righetsgraden ?r ?nd? bra. Kanske lite sv?rt att f?rst? termiologi som "thermal fluctuations" n?r det inte gick att sl? upp i boken :-) (Valuable)
- It is useful, but the first one was not so easy. May be a course to explain how work Matlab could be a ggod idea, because I didn't know how to use it (Average)
- Too difficult (eg time consuming) to be of any value; I would be learned more studying that time by myself than being required to solve those problems. (Not so valuable)

My prerequisites

8 svarande

More than enough1 12%
Enough4 50%
Not enough3 37%

- I took this course thinking that I will learn more about ensembles and stuff... (Not enough)
- Men inget kursen kan belastas f?r. (Not enough)
- I didn't do formal thermodynamics and statistical mecanics (canonical ensemble,...) at all before! I thought we would do that in this course. (Not enough)

How difficult did you find the course?

8 svarande

Very difficult0 0%
Difficult7 87%
Average1 12%
Easy0 0%
Very easy0 0%

- lagom med nya teorier. Kursen har en r?d tr?d vilket ?r v?ldigt viktigt. (Difficult)

How much work did the course take compared to other courses?

8 svarande

Much more0 0%
Somewhat more6 75%
Average2 25%
Somewhat less0 0%
Much less0 0%

- Jag har och kommer f? l?gga mycket tid p? l?xorna. (Somewhat more)
- To solve many of the hw problems I had to look in other books/google as looking in the course book/lecutre/class notes/old exams didn't give me any idea of how to solve those problems. (Somewhat more)
- Jag l?ser tre fyra kurser just nu och k?nner att det tar mer ?n 25 % av tiden. (Somewhat more)

Kursutvärderingssystem från

[Theoretical physics home page] [KTH home page]   webmaster