Teoretisk fysiks kursutväderingar

 

Resultat av: Inledande simuleringsfysik, SI1335, vt 2014

Status: Avslutad
Publicerad under: 2014-04-30 - 2015-01-19
Antal svar: 2
Procent av kursdeltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Berk Hess

How much have I learned about simulations?

2 svarande

Very much0 0%
A lot2 100%
Little0 0%
Nothing0 0%

- Lots of different approaches, and the free book is really interesting. (A lot)


What do you think about the course format?

2 svarande

Very good0 0%
Good2 100%
Not so good0 0%
Bad0 0%

- Course format is excellent if there is a good group. For a small group with students whose motivation is very different, it would be better with more "how to do this in a good way" teaching. Perhaps refer more strictly to the book. I had no problems finding info on my own, but several others didn't manage that. So the presentations were very uneven in quality, I felt I learnt the most from reading literature and Berk's comments, and very little from my classmates. (Good)


Did the course reach its goals (see the goals on the course page)?

2 svarande

Very well0 0%
Well2 100%
Not so well0 0%
Not at all0 0%

- I would have liked more specific information about good error metrics, best practices, smart workflows etc. (Well)


What do you think of the course material?

2 svarande

Very good1 50%
Good0 0%
Not so good1 50%
Bad0 0%

- Book was great and Berks projects apparently came more or less directly from the book so I read the book alongside with the lecture notes. (Very good)
- Some sections needs more fleshing out than an image on a slide and a one-time verbal description. The extra help hours and added matplotlib tutorials helped bridge this gap, but some more work can still be done. (Not so good)


Did you look up information from the references given in lectures?

2 svarande

More than twice1 50%
Once or twice1 50%
Never0 0%

- I'm a compulsive reader, I read everything more than twice. (More than twice)
- I often went and found my own instead. (Once or twice)


Did you have sufficient physics background for the projects?

2 svarande

Physics was too easy0 0%
Physics level was good2 100%
Physics was too hard0 0%

- Honestly, I suck at physics and don't have "physics intuition". I would like to say the physics level was too easy, but for me it was just right. (Physics level was good)


What do you think about the level of programming required?

2 svarande

Too demanding0 0%
Good2 100%
Too trivial/easy0 0%

- The course was very open-ended so I could make programming as hard/easy as I wanted. (Good)
- the programming in itself is not advanced, however this is not a programming course. Instead, the challenge (and focus) was on modelling the simulations. (Good)


Was it clear what to do in the projects?

2 svarande

Very clear0 0%
Clear1 50%
Unclear1 50%

- Sometimes it was very clear, sometimes not at all. Reading the book helped a lot. (Clear)
- I've more than once spent an hour just trying to understand the question. This can be due to the slim way the questions are put, or in the scarcity of description in the material (presentations) which makes it hard to spot what you're asking for. More descriptions! Maybe in the comment field on each presentation? (Unclear)


Would you prefer more open ended projects?

2 svarande

Yes, very open ended0 0%
Yes, a bit more open ended0 0%
No2 100%

- I think the open endedness was fine. It would be nice to see some concrete examples of how to use the methods in the project. For example, you make a million random walk polymers - now what do you do with them? (No)


Was the workload OK for a 6 HP (4 full weeks) course?

2 svarande

Too much work1 50%
Average1 50%
Less than average0 0%

- This is hard to judge as we had two very work-heavy courses simultaneously. The adapted workload which was agreed upon during the course would be sufficient, if the "lessened" load is spread out better (the first few weeks were already over and stressful) (Too much work)


Do you have suggestions for new simulation topics?

2 svarande

Yes (please comment)1 50%
No1 50%

- Would be nice with more agent-based simulation, like ant algorithms, or simple genetic algorithms. (Yes (please comment))



Kursutvärderingssystem från

[Theoretical physics home page] [KTH home page]   webmaster